Did you ever notice after the end of a World Series or a Super Bowl, the winning team is always called “Champions of the World” ?
Doesn’t that just sound wrong, ignorant and a bit narcissistic? I just cringe ever time I hear that, which sucks because it’s the end of the game meaning I’m usually in my happy place. Thank you Coors Light.
I believe this said title is a combination of a couple of things: Americans sports + Winners = National Arrogance
But why only Football and Baseball? Why no NBA or Hockey or Handball?
Football and Baseball would be the only sports to crown their winners, ‘World Champions,’ because those two sports are American. Baseball is as American as apple pie and Football was invented in America. Who are we kidding, who the hell else loves and plays football like we do? Not a whole lot of other countries play football to say the least. The whole conception of football is constantly referred to as a war, where the quarterback is the general and his troops (teammates) go into the battlefield. The comparison alone should be any indication that the USA loves war, a feeling that exerts this country into dominance while creating this deluded sense of super power. Which is why when football was conceived, some said Football was a new American pastime. Hmmmmm let me think about that…that would be a big fat NO.
Baseball is America’s pastime. No Duh. Baseball isn’t compared to war or American dominance…the whole point is to stay safe and run home….which is perhaps why the sport is embraced and played by many countries…..countries that…..do i dare say….love it more than America?
Obviously I’m talking about Japan. I don’t know if they necessarily love it more because it isn’t their historical ‘pastime’ but they sure do worship the sport. Which is awesome for America right? I love how Baseball is considered a more international sport as well as a catalyst for friendly foreign relations.
So World Champions? How the hell do we get away with that?
Both Football and Baseball were first played in America, when no other countries at the time were aware or even knew about the sports. Baseball was first played in the 1800’s while Football was first played over 75 years ago. So I guess by default if no other countries were played the sport, this meant that that their champion is the ‘World Champion.’ By the time other countries starting playing the sport and competing on a professional level, Super Bowl and World Series winners being considered ‘World Champions’ was common practice and stuck. I mean ‘WORLD’ Series….come on.
But is it at all possible to evolve from that and consider the rest of the world? No, this is America, the best, the proud and true. But even in the Olympics when a team or an individual wins, I can’t recall them being dubbed ‘World Champions,’ when in actuality they are because they are competing on a world level, competing with other countries. Olympic athletes are the best of the best while we like to think that the football players in the NFL and baseball players in the MLB are the best of the best. But they are only the best in the USA. America doesn’t want to consider other countries because they don’t have to.
Nothing but love for one of the greatest countries in the world, but when it comes to this word choice for our sport’s champions, is a bit nauseating. The problem is there is no accountability. America isn’t going to catch itself saying it let alone other countries going to correct it. Other countries just don’t care because there is no point for debate. America isn’t going to budge over for something that places them on a national pedestal and no other country wants to piss of America particularly over a very beloved and sacred topic.
If anyone was to challenge this American narcissism would be a notable and well-respected broadcaster, like Bob Costas. He hasn’t covered the Super Bowl nor World Series in about 10 years but if was to come back, I could see him calling out the ‘World Championship’ title as archaic and rude. And then he would be fired.